نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه دین دانشگاه پیام نور تهران

2 گروه الهیات دانشگاه پیام نور تهران

3 استاد یار گروه الهیات دانشگاه پیام نور تهران

4 استاد گروه فلسفه اسلامی دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

چکیده:

دیوید باس از بارزترین نظریه پردازان حوزه روان شناسی تکاملی است معروفیت او بیشتر به خاطر نظریه "استراتژی های جنسی" است. بررسی ما بر روی آثار او نشان می دهد که بسیاری از یافته های علمی او با برخی از باورهای دینی همخوانی و سازگاری دارد .

این پژوهش کوشیده است تا نشان دهد که از این یافته های علمی می توان برای تبیین بهتر اندیشه های دینی استفاده کرد چراکه این یافته ها هدف، فلسفه و کارکرد برخی از باورهای دینی را که تا قبل از این تفسیر مشخصی نداشتند، آشکار و روشن می سازد. در عین حالی که نظریات روانشناسی تکاملی دین به طور عام و یافته های دیوید باس به طور خاص نمی توانند جنبه ماورایی داشتن باورهای دینی را از نفس بیندازند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evolutionary Explanation of some Religious teachings Based on the Views of David Buss

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elyas Rezaie 1
  • Mehdi Khademi 2
  • Masome Salarirad 3
  • Jalal Peykani 4

1 PhD student in Philosophy of Religion, Payam Noor University, Tehran

2 Associate Professor of Theology at Payam Noor University, Tehran. Iran

3 Associate Professor of Theology at Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran,

4 Professor of the Islamic Philosophy Department. Payam Noor University

چکیده [English]

Abstract
David Buss is one of the most prominent theorists in the field of evolutionary psychology. His fame is largely due to his theory of sexual strategies. our review of his works indicates that many of his scientific findings are consistent and compatible certain religious beliefs. This research has attempted to demonstrate that these scientific findings can be used to better explain and understand religious ideas. Because these findings reveal and clarify the purpose, philosophy, and functions of certain religious beliefs that previously lacked a clear interpretation while evolutionary psychology of religion in general and David Buss’s findings in particular cannot negate the supernatural aspect of religious beliefs, The provide valuable insights into the psychological and evolutionary foundations of such beliefs.
Keywords: Evolutionary Psychology of Religion, Evolution, Religion, Religious beliefs, David Buss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Introduction
 David Buss attempts to explain all human behavior through evolution. According to him, just as our organs, their form and functioning are the products of evolution, behavior, perception, and cognition of humans are also the products of evolution. Based on evolutionary psychology foundations, religious beliefs — like other aspects of human knowledge and perception — are considered to be a product of the brain. From Buss’s perspective, religion is a by-product of other
brain adaptations.
David Buss focuses his research on the domain of “Sexual Strategies,” arguing that these play a fundamental role in evolution. He suggests that some religious beliefs may be related to sexual processes. This research aims to address two questions: first, whether the concordance between David Bass’s findings and certain religious beliefs can be leveraged for the benefit of religion? and second, whether evolutionary explanations of religion and Bass’s findings can negate aspects of the supernatural in religious beliefs?
 
Materials and Methods
The analysis of the relationship between David Buss’s findings in evolutionary psychology and religious beliefs is regarded as the central focus of this study. Accordingly, the present research has been conducted using a descriptive–analytical method, implemented as follows: first, the foundations of David Buss’s evolutionary psychology are reviewed; then, among his works, findings that are consonant with and compatible with religious beliefs are identified; finally, the issue is analyzed.
 
Discussion and Result
According to Buss, sexual choice is a powerful force in evolution. He endeavors to explain all behaviors of women and men through two principles: “paternal uncertainty” and “Resource acquisition.” What Buss has achieved in the Sexual Strategies theory aligns with some religious beliefs. The control of female sexuality by men, veiling, virginity, menstrual taboos, the use of kinship terms and encouragement of kinship support, polygyny, prohibition of abortion, homosexuality and masturbation, support for marriage and family formation, purity-related laws, and related norms are examples of these beliefs.
Despite Buss's view that religion is a useful commodity and, as a biological program, operates in concert with evolutionary processes for survival and reproduction, he nevertheless claims that these compatibilities do not undermine the claim that religion may be a by-product. Accordingly, religion faces major challenges: that religion is not a divine or supernatural phenomenon and that the rightful domain of religion resides in the human brain; and that the ultimate explanations of faith, and indeed the explanation of any religious behavior, are not theology but biology and evolutionary psychology. These are among the most significant challenges.
 
Conclusion
David Buss, in the evolutionary explanation of some human behaviors, has scientifically explained some religious beliefs, and this issue is highly valuable for
religions because, through this, he has paved a plausible path for believers to gain new insights into religious phenomena. Additionally, religious systems have often deemed adherence to norms of proper behavior compatible with evolution as necessary and essential, and these considerations constitute a winning card for religion, since, by taking these factors into account, religion will be more aligned with science than with superstition.
Evolutionary approaches to religion, including the findings of David Buss, cannot dismiss religious beliefs merely because they are by-products of adaptations of our brains. If they were, all other scientific laws, including this science of evolutionary psychology, would also need to be set aside as mere additions lacking value. Since all of these are brain-constructed, there is no fundamental difference between religious and scientific beliefs on this account. Evolutionary approaches to religion should be used not to harm religion but to aid in explaining religious beliefs, and it is appropriate for the believers to reexamine some of their positions and approaches in this area.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Evolutionary Psychology of Religion
  • Evolution
  • Religion
  • Religious beliefs
  • David Buss
زما استیون تی (1402)، چرا به دین محتاجیم، ترجمه محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی، چاپ اول، تهران، نشر نی.
اوانس دیلان و زارات اسکار (1393)، روان‌شناسی تکاملی، ترجمه نورالدین رحمانیان، چاپ اول، تهران، پردیس دانش،.
باس دیوید (1392)، روان­شناسی تکاملی: استراتژی‌های جفتی زنان و مردان، ترجمه آرش حسینیان، چاپ اول، مشهد، نشر تلنگر.
باس دیوید (1396)، روان‌شناسی تکاملی، حسادت، سلطه، خشونت، ترجمه آرش حسینیان، چاپ اول، مشهد، نشر تلنگر.
باس دیوید (1397)، تحلیل نظام‌های جفتی انسان تک‌همسری، چند همسری و پیامدهای روانی اجتماعی، ترجمه آرش حسینیان، چاپ اول، مشهد، نشر تلنگر.
باس دیوید (1397)، روان‌شناسی تکاملی چالش‌های والدین و خویشاوندی، ترجمه آرش حسینیان و الهام ذوالقدر، چاپ اول، مشهد، نشر تلنگر.
باس دیوید (1399)، روان‌شناسی فرگشتی دانش نوین در ذهن، ترجمه سروش نجف زاده و علیرضا نجف زاده، چاپ اول، تهران، چشم انداز قطب.
پاتریک کرک (1393)، دلبستگی تکامل و روان‌شناسی دین، ترجمه دکتر غلامرضا محمودی، چاپ اول، تهران، نشر وانیا.
پورمحمدی نعیمه (1402)، علوم شناختی دین، چاپ اول، تهران، نشر کرگدن.
دانبار رابین (1401)، چگونه ادیان تکامل یافتند چرا باید دین داشت، ترجمه فرح آملی، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات تألیف.
دنت دنیل (1400)، ایده خطرناک داروین فرگشت و معناهای زندگی، ترجمه احسان شاه قاسمی، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات لوگوس.
دنتون مایکل (1401)، تکامل نظریه‌ای در بحران، ترجمه فرشته میرزایی پور، چاپ اول، تهران، نشر هرمس.
مایر ارنست (1400)، چیستی تکامل، ترجمه مهدی صادقی، چاپ ششم، تهران، نشر نی.
هات جان اف (1400)، خدا و الحاد جدید، ترجمه علی شهبازی، چاپ دوم، قم، دانشگاه مفید.
هیپل ویلیام فون (1399)، جهش اجتماعی، ترجمه میثم محمد امینی، چاپ اول، تهران، نشر نو.
 
Book:
Atran Scott (2004), In Gods We Trust the Evolutionary Landscape of Religion, Oxford University Press.
Boyer Pascal (2001), Religion Explained the Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought, Basic Books.
Buss David M. (2002), Evolutionary Psychology the New Science of the Mind, Boston Pearson.
Dean Hamer (2006), How Faith Is Hardwired into Our Genes, Doubleday.
Dennet Daniel (1995), Darwin’s Dangerous Idea Evolution and the Meaning of Life, New York: touchstone.
Liddle James R. and Shackel Ford odd K (2021), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Religion, Oxford University Press.
Vernon Mark (2019), A Secret History of Christianity Jesus, The Last Inkling and the Evolution of Consciousness, John Hunt.
Watts Fraser and Turner Leon (2014), Evolution Religion & Cognitive Science Critical and Constructive Essays, Oxford University Press.
Wester Mark (1927), The History of Human Marriage, vol 111, Macmillian and Co-limited ST. Martin’s Street, London.
 
Article:
Avansiyke James A and Szocik Konrad (2020), Sexual Selection and Religion Can the Evolution of Religion Be Explained in Terms Mating Strategist? Journals sage pud, 1-19.
Buss David M and Dedden Lisa A (1990), Derogation of Competitions, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 7, 395-422. London
Buss David M and Larsen Randy J and others (1992), Sex Differences in Jealousy Evolution Physiology and Psychology, Psychological Science, Vol 3, No 4, 251-255.
Buss David M and Others (1998), Adaptation, Exaltation and Spandrels, American Psychologist, 533-548.
Buss David M and Others (2002), Distress About Mating Rivals, Personal Relationship. 7, 235-243.
Buss David M and Others (2007), A Half Century of Mate Preferences the Cultural Evolution of Values, Journal of marriage and Family 63, 491-503.
Buss David M and Others (2020), Human Status Criteria: Sex Differences and Similarities Across 14 Nation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1-59.
Buss David M and Schmitt David P (2011), Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism, Springer Nature, vol 64, 768-787.
Buss David M and Shackel Ford Todd K (1997), Cues to in Fidelity. PSPB, Vol. 23, No.10, 1034-104.
Buss David M and Shackel Ford Todd K (1997), Human Aggression in Evolutionary Psychological Perspective, Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 17. No. 6, 605-619.
Buss David M (1984), Evolutionary Biology and Personality: Toward a Conception of Human Nature and Individual Difference, American Psychologist, Vol 39. No 10.11, 1135-1147.
Buss David M (1984), Martial Assortment for Personality Dispositions: Assessment with Three Different Data Sources, Behavior Genetics, Vol 14, No 2, 111-123.
Buss David M (1984), Toward a Psychology of Person-Environment (PE) Correlation: The Role of Spouse Selection, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 47, No 2, 361-377.
Buss David M (1987), Selection and Manipulation, Journal of Personality Social Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 6, 1214-1221.
Buss David M (1987), Selection Evocation and Manipulation, Journal of Personality Social Psychology, Vol 53, No 6, 1214-1221.
Buss David M (1998), Sexual Strategies Theory Origins and Current status, The Journal of Sex Research, vol 35, No 1, 19-31.
Buss David M (2000), The Dangerous Passion Why Jealousy Is as Necessary as Love and Sex, Free Press.
Buss David M (2000), The Evolution of Happiness, Journal American Psychologist, 15-23.
Buss David M (2007), The Evolution of Human Mating, University of Texas Austin Acta Psychological Sinica, 39:3, 502-512.
Buss David M (2009), The Great Struggles of Life Darwin and The Emergence of Evolutionary Psychology, American Psychologists, Vol 64, No 2, 140-148.
Buss David M (2013), Sexual Jealousy, Psychological Topics, 22.2 155-182.
Buss David M (2018), The Evolution of Love in Humans, University of Texas at Austin, 42-63.
Buss David M (2024), Is Evolutionary Psychology a Scientific Revolution?, Research a Bibliometric Analysis, Vol. 10, 31-49.
Buss David M, and Craik Kenneth H (1980), The Frequency Concept of Disposition Dominance and Prototypically Dominant Acts, Journal of Personality A 8:3, 379-392.
Buss, David M. (2002), Sex Marriage and Religion What Adaptive Problems Do Religious Phenomena Solve? Psychological Inquiry, Vol 13, No. 3, 201-238.
Buss, David M., The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, 724-746.
Plantinga Alvin (2011), Where the Conflict Really Lies?, Books Google, 1-26.
Sanderson Stephen K (2008), Adaptation, Evolution and Religion, Religion 38, 141-156.
Shawaf Laith Al and Others (2016), Human Emotion: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective, Emotion Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 173-186.
Stucky Kerstin and Gardner Y (2022), The Evolution of Religiosity by Kin Selection, Published in Religion Brain Map, 347-364.