نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه فلسفه، دانشکده حقوق الهیات و علوم سیاسی؛ واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقالۀ حاضر تلاشی است در جهت تحلیل فلسفی و نقادی «روان‌شناسی اسلامی». دعوی مقاله آن است که آنچه امروزه در ایران روان‌شناسی اسلامی خوانده می‌شود مفهومی بیش از حد فراگیر، مبهم، و درهم‌آمیخته است. هدف آن است که ذیل آن حیطه‌های نسبتاً مجزایی را تشخیص دهیم. عده‌ای از این عنوان، نوعی علم دینی را استنباط می‌کنند و به معنایی مشابه »اقتصاد اسلامی» آن را «روان‌شناسی اسلامی» می‌خوانند. در مقاله، از منظری فلسفۀ علمی، این برداشت از روان‌شناسی اسلامی نقد می‌شود. برخی دیگر مطالعه‌ی روانشناسانه‌ی اسلام را در نظر دارند که با این برداشت می‌توان آن را ذیل «روانشناسی دین» گنجاند و آن را «روان‌شناسی اسلام» خواند. در مقاله برخی پبشنهادها برای کار در این حوزه عرضه می‌شود. دسته‌ای نیز به وجه تکنولوژیک روانشناسی اسلامی اشاره، و آن را به عنوان نوعی روان‌شناسی مذهبی درنظر دارند. در این مقاله پنج معنای متفاوت از «روان‌شناسی اسلامی» معرفی می‌شود. دعوی مقاله آن است که عدم توجه به این تفکیک‌ها از علل اصلی ابهام‌های فراوانِ موجود در «روان‌شناسی اسلامی» است و توجه به آنها می‌تواند به پژوهش‌گران علاقمند به این حوزه کمک کند تا جایگاه پژوهش خود را در گستره‌ی روابط متنوعی که میان روان‌شناسی و دین وجود دارد شناسایی کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Islamic Psychology: a Philosophical and Critical Appraisal

نویسنده [English]

  • Hadi samadi

Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences; Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

This paper attempts a philosophical and critical appraisal of "Islamic Psychology". The claim of the article is that the so-called Islamic psychology in Iran is too comprehensive, ambiguous, and blended. The paper aims to distinguish relatively separate areas under it. Some people infer a kind of religious science from this title and call it "Islamic psychology" in the same sense as "Islamic economics". In the article, this perception of Islamic psychology is criticized. Others have a different understanding of this concept and consider the psychological study of Islam, which can be better included under the "psychology of religion" and called the "psychology of Islam". In the article, some suggestions for work in this field are presented. Another group also refers to the technological aspect of Islamic psychology, and considers it as a kind of religious psychology. This article introduces five different meanings of "Islamic psychology". Failure to pay attention to these distinctions is among the main causes of ambiguities in Islamic psychology.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Islamic psychology
  • psychology of religion
  • religious psychology
  • philosophy
  • metaphor
آقابابایی، ناصر، (1397)، «نقد پژوهش‌های علم عصب‌نگر در حوزه دین و معنویت»، روان‌شناسی فرهنگی، دوره 2 شماره 2 صص 104-81.
سنایی، علی، (1395)، «تحلیل فلسفی دیدگاه نیوبرگ در الهیات عصب (الگویی برای رابطۀ علم و دین)»، پژوهش‌های علم و دین، شماره 14، صص 42-25.
Abu-Raiya, H. (2013). The psychology of Islam: Current empirically based knowledge, potential challenges, and directions for future research, in Pargament, K. I., Exline, J. J., & Jones, J. W. APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol 1): Context, theory, and research. American Psychological Association.
Abu-Raiya, H., & Pargament, K. I. (2011). Empirically based psychology of Islam: Summary and critique of the literature. Mental Health, Religion & Culture14(2), 93-115.
Argyle, M., & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2013). The social psychology of religion (Psychology Revivals). Routledge.
Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. The handbook of research synthesis25, 299-409.
Benslama, F. (2009). Psychoanalysis and the Challenge of Islam. U of Minnesota Press.
Besecke, K. (2007). Beyond literalism: Reflexive spirituality and religious meaning. Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives, 169-86.
Black, D. M. (Ed.). (2012). Psychoanalysis and Religion in the 21st Century. Routledge.
Bulbulia, J., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E., Evans, N., Francois, P., Gintis, H., ... & Wilson, D. S. (2013). The cultural evolution of religion. In Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language, and religion. MIT Press.
Buss, D. M. (2009). The great struggles of life: Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary psychology. American psychologist64(2), 140.
Capps, D. (2001). Agents of hope: A pastoral psychology. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Carrette, J. (Ed.). (2004). William James and the varieties of religious experience: A centenary celebration. Routledge.
Cornish, M. A., & Wade, N. G. (2010). Spirituality and religion in group counseling: A literature review with practice guidelines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice41(5), 398.
Dennett, D. C. (2007). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. Penguin.
Edgell, P. (2012). A cultural sociology of religion: New directions. Annual Review of Sociology38(1), 247-65.
Emmons, R. A. (1998). Religion and personality. In Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 63-74). Academic Press.
Emmons, R. A. (1999). Religion in the psychology of personality: An introduction. Journal of personality67(6), 874-888.
Fayek, A. (2004). Islam and its effect on my practice of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology21(3), 452.
Fletcher, G. J. (1996). Realism versus relativism in psychology. The American Journal of Psychology, 409-429.
Fowler, J. W. Stages of Faith: The Psychology of Human Development and the Quest for Meaning. San Francisco: Harper dr Row, 1981.
Henrich, Joseph (2020). The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Hofstadter, A. (1951). Professor Ryle's category-mistake. The Journal of Philosophy48(9), 257-270.
Ingersoll, R. E. (1994). Spirituality, religion, and counseling: Dimensions and relationships. Counseling and values38(2), 98-111.
Iqbal, N., & Skinner, R. (2021). Islamic psychology: Emergence and current challenges. Archive for the Psychology of Religion43(1), 65-77.
James, W. (2003). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. Routledge.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(2), 126-136.
Kelly Jr, E. W. (1995). Spirituality and religion in counseling and psychotherapy: Diversity in theory and practice. American Counseling Association.
Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1999). Toward an evolutionary psychology of religion and personality. Journal of personality67(6), 921-952.
Kugelmann, R. (2011). Psychology and Catholicism: contested boundaries. Cambridge University Press.
Leeming, D. A., (Ed.). (2020). Encyclopedia of psychology and religion. Springer US.
Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and social psychology review11(1), 68-86.
Mackay, N., & Petocz, A. (Eds.). (2010). Realism and psychology: Collected essays. Brill.
Massad, J. (2009). Psychoanalysis, Islam, and the other of liberalism. Psychoanalysis and History11(2), 193-208.
Muravchik, S. (2011). American Protestantism in the age of psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Newberg, A. B. (2016). Principles of neurotheology. Routledge.
Norenzayan, A., & Gervais, W. M. (2012). The cultural evolution of religion. Creating consilience: Integrating science and the humanities, 243-265.
Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. Guilford Publications.
Pargament, K. I. (2001). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford press.
Pargament, K. I., Exline, J. J., & Jones, J. W. (2013). APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol 1): Context, theory, and research. American Psychological Association.
Park, C., Cohen, L. H., & Herb, L. (1990). Intrinsic religiousness and religious coping as life stress moderators for Catholics versus Protestants. Journal of personality and social psychology59(3), 562.
Parker, I. (1998). Realism, relativism and critique in psychology. Social constructionism, discourse and realism, 1-10.
Phillips III, R. E., Pargament, K. I., Lynn, Q. K., & Crossley, C. D. (2004). Self‐Directing Religious Coping: A Deistic God, Abandoning God, or No God at All?. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion43(3), 409-418.
Proudfoot, W. (Ed.). (2004). William James and a science of religions: Reexperiencing The varieties of religious experience. Columbia University Press.
Rokeach, M., & Regan, J. F. (1980). The role of values in the counseling situation. The personnel and guidance Journal58(9), 576-582.
Rothman, A., & Coyle, A. (2018). Toward a framework for Islamic psychology and psychotherapy: An Islamic model of the soul. Journal of religion and health57(5), 1731-1744.
Saroglou, V., & Cohen, A. B. (2013). Cultural and cross-cultural psychology of religion. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 330–354). The Guilford Press.
Saver, J. L., & Rabin, J. (1997). The neural substrates of religious experience. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance?. Journal of personality and social psychology67(6), 998.
Skinner, R. (2019). Traditions, paradigms and basic concepts in Islamic psychology. Journal of religion and health58(4), 1087-1094.
Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Religion: An overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology34(4), 377-394.
Vitz, P. C. (1994). Psychology as religion: The cult of self-worship. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Watts, F. N. (1996). Psychological and religious perspectives on emotion. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion6(2), 71-87.
Westen, D., (1996). Psychology: Mind, Brain, & Culture, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Wilson, D. (2003) Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion and the Nature of Society, University of Chicago Press.
Winn, W. (2013). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 90-123). Routledge.
Zilboorg, G. (1962). Psychoanalysis and religion. Farrar, Straus & Cudahy.