Document Type : .

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Management, Research Institute of Hawzeh and University, againi@rihu.ac.ir (Corresponding Author)

2 Ph.D. Candidate of Public administration, Research Institute of Hawzeh and University

3 Ph.D. Candidate of Management, Lorestan university

Abstract

Future studies as an efficient tool, in analyzing the trends and factors affecting the rapid changes of social phenomena, draws probable future scenarios. By analyzing the sources, patterns and factors of change and stability, this approach puts new horizons of the future in front of us (exploratory futures) and outlines the requirements to achieve it (normative futures). In the meantime, Islamic humanities have not benefited from this future research capacity and in this research, we are going to examine the research process of one of its examples, that is, Islamic management. In this article, two frameworks are presented for preparing the research scenario: the first scenario focuses on security, avoiding adverse consequences and fulfilling obligations. And the second scenario of research is done in the framework of the existing knowledge of management, considering the necessary changes. The first one deals with the research in management with adaptation under the existing structure of management knowledge while making changes and the second one not under the existing structure of management knowledge but with a new form. This study helps the researchers to adopt a revolutionary strategy in the field of adaptation or formation, considering the future developments.

Keywords

 approach. cambridge: cambridge.
ARCHER, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BRIGAM, M. (2000). Technology, Organization and Actor-NetworkbTheory. university of Warwick.
Brigham, M. (2000). technology, organisation and actor-network theory. univercity of warwick: unpublished manuscrip.
Burton, D. (. (2000). Resaearch training for social scientists. Sage.
Burton, d. (2000). Resaearch training for social scientists. UK: Sage.
Higgins, T. E. (1996). The self digest: Self- knowledge serving self- regulatory Function. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 71.
higgting, E. (1996). The "self digest":Self- knowledge Serving self-regulatory functiond. 7(16).
Jin, Z. (2011). Global Technological Change: From Hard Technology to Soft Technology - Second Edition. United Kingdom: Intellect Ltd.
Rindova, v., & Courtney, h. (1984). To shape or adapt: Knowledge problem, epistemologies, and strategic postures under Knightian uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 5(2),, 111-128.
Robbins, P. S. (1990). Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Applications. Englewood: Prentice Hall.
robbins, s. (1991). management. englewood clifs: prentice-hall.
Robbins, S. (1991). Managment. Prentice-Hal: Englewood Cliffs.
Tsoukas, H. K. (2005). The Oxford Hanbook of ORGANIZATION THEORY. OXFORD: OXFORD university PRESS.
Tsoukas, H., & Knudsen, C. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Organization theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
ابن فارس, ا. (1387). ترتیب مقاییس اللغه. قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
اعرابی, ف. ج. (1375). مدیریت. تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهش‌های بازرگانی.
بابکی, ا., کاظمی, م., & قرونه, ح. (1397). بررسی مفاهیم و مبانی پس نگری و مقایسه آن با پیش بینی و چشم انداز سازی. فصلنامه آینده پژوهی مدیریت, 18.
ترک, ع., نکوییه, م., & درویشی, ف. (1399). ارائه یک مدل فرآیندی یکپارچه برای ارزیابی آینده‌نگاری راهبردی در سطح ملی با رویکرد مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری. آینده پزوهی ایران, 1-33.
چمران, ه. ک. (1378). صول مدیریت . تهران: دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، مؤسسه انتشارات علمی.
حیدری, ا. (1393). مبانی و مفاهیم آینده پزوهی. ترویج علم, 81-85.
رابینز, ا. پ. (1390). تئوری سازمان: ساختار و طرح سازمانی. (ح. دانایی‌فرد, & س. الوانی, Trans.) تهران: اشراقی.