Science and Religion Studies

Science and Religion Studies

Interpreting the Existence of God Using Artificial Intelligence Responses (Study subject: ChatGPT )

Document Type : .

Authors
Mohammad Amin Torabi 1
Masoumeh Sahraei 2
1 PhD in Business Administration, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author),
2 Level 4 (PhD equivalent), field of comparative interpretation, Zainbiye (S) Specialized Center, Khorram Abad, Lorestan, Iran
10.30465/srs.2024.47252.2108
Abstract
Abstract
Throughout history, one of the greatest intellectual and philosophical challenges humanities has faced is the question of the existence of God. With technological advancements and the emergence of artificial intelligence, an opportunity has now arisen to approach this question from a new angle, utilizing the advanced capabilities of artificial intelligence. The research methodology of this study is applied in terms of its purpose and exploratory (simulation) in nature. In the first phase, it continued with responses from the intelligent system ChatGPT until reaching the saturation point of answers. In the second phase, using thematic analysis, each of the responses was semantically coded and placed in common themes. The findings were categorized and interpreted in four sections: philosophical, religious, perceptual, and scientific. The results indicate that, from a philosophical perspective, artificial intelligence has the capability to contemplate the concept of the existence of God. Religiously, it analyzes and interprets religious texts and concepts with precision. Perceptually, it has the ability to understand and recognize various types of experiences, feelings, and thoughtful reflections on God, analyzing and reconstructing these perception ns based on existing patterns in the data. Scientifically, it precisely presents the intersections and scientific relationships regarding existence and creation, exploration, and ultimate results.
Keywords: Philosophy of God’s Existence, Proof of God’s Existence, Artificial Intelligence and God, ChatGPT
 
 
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The concept of God has played a central role in shaping human civilization, whether through religious practice, ethical frameworks, or existential contemplation. Believers often argue that acknowledging a higher power confers meaning and moral direction, while skeptics challenge the coherence or necessity of such a being. Technological breakthroughs in AI now present an unprecedented opportunity to re-examine and synthesize the vast corpus of human thought around God’s existence. Specifically, ChatGPT draws upon extensive datasets encompassing philosophy, theology, history, and science, enabling the creation of structured, comprehensive answers to questions that have occupied thinkers for centuries. Yet the question remains: Does AI shed new light on the debate, or merely reorganize existing ideas? This research addresses that query by documenting ChatGPT’s responses to systematically designed prompts about God’s existence, scrutinizing the arguments produced, and evaluating how these align with or differ from traditional scholarly discourse.
Materials & Methods
We adopted an exploratory, simulation-based methodology, divided into two phases. In the first phase, a series of questions—probing both the affirmative and negative positions on God’s existence—were posed to ChatGPT in iterative rounds. The process continued until thematic saturation was verified by a panel of ten experts in philosophy, theology, and cognitive science who reviewed each AI-generated response for novelty and consistency. Once the experts deemed that no substantially new themes emerged, the data was consolidated for analysis. In the second phase, we conducted a thematic coding of the AI’s answers, labeling distinct arguments, examples, and references to philosophical and religious traditions. This coding was subjected to peer validation, ensuring that at least 70% of the experts agreed on the classification of each theme. The final dataset was then arranged into four major categories—philosophical, religious, perceptual, and scientific—and subsequently evaluated to illustrate the depth and range of AI-generated content on God’s existence.
Discussion & Result
The analysis demonstrates that ChatGPT consistently reproduces a broad array of arguments commonly found in classical philosophy, including cosmological reasoning positing a first cause, teleological claims highlighting design in nature, and moral arguments linking ethical absolutes to a divine lawgiver. Additionally, the AI presents counterpoints such as the problem of evil, the apparent redundancy of God in scientific explanations, and the diversity of religious traditions as challenges to the notion of a singular, all-powerful deity. On religious themes, the data indicates that ChatGPT can summarize doctrinal perspectives from multiple faiths, addressing concepts of God as Creator, the role of prophets, and scriptural evidence for and against the existence of a supreme being. In the perceptual domain, ChatGPT highlights personal experiences, crisis moments, and a search for spiritual fulfillment as important influences on belief in God. This includes references to cultural and social cohesion, as well as the psychological comfort that believers often derive from trusting a higher power. From a scientific standpoint, ChatGPT integrates ideas from physics, cosmology, and evolutionary biology, noting that while empirical methods can describe how reality operates, they often remain silent on why reality exists in the first place. Significantly, the AI model remains neutral, clarifying that its responses are drawn from comprehensive but ultimately human-authored sources. This neutrality underscores that any final judgment on God’s existence transcends purely algorithmic logic or data-driven aggregation of viewpoints. The result is an instructive illustration of AI’s ability to amalgamate disparate strands of intellectual tradition while reminding us that existential and spiritual truths may extend beyond the realm of computational discovery.
Conclusion
 In summary, this research reveals that AI, particularly ChatGPT, provides valuable insights into the longstanding debate on God’s existence by assembling and articulating a wide range of arguments gleaned from philosophical texts, religious doctrines, and scientific hypotheses. The thematic diversity detected in the AI’s output illustrates both the richness of human reflection on God and the limitations of seeking absolute certainty through computational means. While ChatGPT can serve as a powerful tool for scholars and students to explore the landscape of arguments around divinity, it does not claim to resolve ultimate metaphysical queries. The study underscores the reality that questions of faith, transcendence, and meaning remain intimately personal and may resist definitive resolution by purely data-driven, logical processes. Rather, AI’s role may best be viewed as a catalyst for deeper inquiry, prompting renewed reflection and dialogue. Future research could refine AI’s capacity to contextualize theological arguments and incorporate more nuanced cultural or linguistic subtleties, yet the core insight stands: the final answer on God’s existence likely resides within the lived experience, contemplative reasoning, and open-hearted seeking of each individual.
Keywords
Philosophy of the Existence of God
Proof of the Existence of God
Proving God with Artificial Intelligence
ChatGPT
Ambrozy, M., Králik, R., Tavilla, I., & Roubalová, M. (2019). Sustainable life conditions from the view of logic, physics and astronomy. European Journal of science and Theology, 15(3), 145-155.
Andideh, A., & Rad, A. (2021). The Concept of God as Light according to Imami Exegetes. Religious Inquiries, 10(20), 7-19.
ASGHARI, M., & Faqihi, F. S. (2023). An Analytical Study of the Proof of Awareness of Knowledge of God's Existence with an Emphasis on the Views of Three Contemporary Philosophers.
Badillo, S., Banfai, B., Birzele, F., Davydov, I. I., Hutchinson, L., Kam‐Thong, T., Siebourg‐Polster, J., Steiert, B., & Zhang, J. D. (2020). An introduction to machine learning. Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics, 107(4), 871-885.
Bordegoni, M., & Ferrise, F. (2023). Exploring the intersection of metaverse, digital twins, and artificial intelligence in training and maintenance. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 23(6), 060806.
Boyles, C. A. (2021). God and Quantum Physics. Wheatmark, Inc.
Broad, C. D. (1939). Arguments for the Existence of God. II. The journal of theological Studies, 40(158), 156-167.
Chenari, Y. H. (2023). Ontological Analysis of the Relationship between God and the World from the Perspective of Mulla Sadra and Plato.
Collins-Taylor, F. (2020). Can God Only Exist in the Present Moment? Aporia, 20.
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in chatgpt: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444-452.
Craig, W. L. (2011). Five Arguments for God. In.
Demiri, L. (2022). God and Creation. Sapientia Islamica, 89.
Descartes, R. (2023). Six Metaphysical Meditations: Wherein it is proved that there is a God and that mans mind is really distinct from his body. Good Press.
Di Ceglie, R. (2022). God, the Good, and the Spiritual Turn in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Dover, M. (2023). The Multiverse Argument for the Existence of God University of Arkansas].
Entezari, A., Aslani, A., Zahedi, R., & Noorollahi, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in energy systems: A bibliographic perspective. Energy Strategy Reviews, 45, 101017.
Evans, C. S., & Baggett, D. (2014). Moral arguments for the existence of God.
Eysenbach, G. (2023). The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: a conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e46885.
Fanni, S. C., Febi, M., Aghakhanyan, G., & Neri, E. (2023). Natural language processing. In Introduction to Artificial Intelligence (pp. 87-99). Springer.
Firat, M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education. Department of Distance Education, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu Unive.
Folkert, V. (2022). God through Cosmic Lenses: Quantum Mystery and Infinite Personality. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education,
Furtak, R. A. (2021). Why Love Entails Suffering: Kierkegaard on the Logical Consequences of Needing God. International Journal on Humanistic Ideology, 11(2), 109-132.
Goyal, S., Doddapaneni, S., Khapra, M. M., & Ravindran, B. (2023). A survey of adversarial defenses and robustness in nlp. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(14s), 1-39.
Gutowski, P. (2023). Creative Thinking about God and Respect for Christian Identity. Roczniki Filozoficzne/Annales de Philosophie/Annals of Philosophy, 71(2), 7-24.
Hildebrand, T., & Metcalf, T. (2022). The nomological argument for the existence of God. Noûs, 56(2), 443-472.
Huallpa, J. J. (2023). Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(4), 105-115.
Huffling, J. B. (2021). Is God Morally Obligated to Prevent Evil? A Response to James Sterba. Religions, 12(5), 312.
Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., & Heinrich, K. (2021). Machine learning and deep learning. Electronic Markets, 31(3), 685-695.
Jessii, P. (2021). The God Equation: Theory of Everything. International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 11(3), 77-98.
Kalla, D., & Smith, N. (2023). Study and Analysis of Chat GPT and its Impact on Different Fields of Study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3).
King, M. R., & ChatGPT. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(1), 1-2.
Kirk, K. E. (2023). The vision of God. BoD–Books on Demand.
Lascano, M. P. (2017). Arguments for the Existence of God. The Routledge companion to seventeenth century philosophy. New York: Routledge, 505-535.
Lennox, J. C. (2021). God and Stephen Hawking 2ND EDITION: Whose Design is it Anyway? Lion Books.
Lewis, H. D. (2021). Our experience of God. Routledge.
Li, D., & Du, L. (2022). Recent advances of deep learning algorithms for aquacultural machine vision systems with emphasis on fish. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1-40.
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29.
Malik, S. A., Karamali, H., & Khalayleh, M. Y. A. (2022). DOES CRITICIZING INTELLIGENT DESIGN (ID) UNDERMINE DESIGN DISCOURSE IN THE QURʾĀN? A KALĀMIC RESPONSE: with Shoaib Ahmed Malik,“Introduction to the Symposium on Islam and Evolution”; Safaruk Zaman Chowdhury,“Explaining Evil in the Bio‐Sphere: Assessing Some Evolutionary Theodicies for Muslim Theists”; Karim Gabor Kocsenda,“Shīʿī Readings of Human Evolution: Ṭabāṭabāʾī to Ḥaydarī”; Khalil Andani,“Evolving Creation: An Ismaili Muslim Interpretation of Evolution”; David Solomon Jalajel,“Presumptions about God's Wisdom in Muslim Arguments for and against Evolution”; and Shoaib Ahmed Malik, Hamza Karamali, and Moamer Yahia Ali Khalayleh,“Does Criticizing Intelligent Design (ID) Undermine Design Discourse in the Qurʾān?”. Zygon®, 57(2), 490-513.
Malinka, K., Peresíni, M., Firc, A., Hujnak, O., & Janus, F. (2023). On the educational impact of ChatGPT: Is Artificial Intelligence ready to obtain a university degree? Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1,
McGee, R. W. (2023). Does God Exist? The ChatGPT Response. The ChatGPT Response (March 24, 2023).
McKenzie, M. D. (2022). The Image of God: A Reflection of Order and Suitability in Design.
Meister, C. (2014). Arguments about the Existence of God. In Philosophy of Religion (pp. 38-59). Springer.
Novaković, A. (2023). Why we do not need demonstrative proof for God’s existence to know that God exists: Robert Nozick’s case for the existence of God. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie(0).
Oppy, G. (2019). Ontological arguments. The Philosophers' Magazine(86), 66-73.
Packer, J. I. (2023). Knowing god. InterVarsity Press.
Pandit, B. V. (2021). Concept Of God In Samkhya Philosophy. Ilkogretim Online, 20(2), 3623-3625.
Panjaitan, F. (2022). Effort to Understanding God: Learn from Stanley J. Samartha. Mahabbah: Journal of Religion & Education, 3(1).
Penchev, V. (2020). God, Logic, and Quantum Information. Available at SSRN 3642471.
Popescu, G. H., Valaskova, K., & Horak, J. (2022). Augmented reality shopping experiences, retail business analytics, and machine vision algorithms in the virtual economy of the metaverse. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 10(2), 67-81.
Qureshi, J. A. (2023). Transcendent God, Rational World: A Māturīdī Theology By Ramon Harvey. In: Oxford University Press.
Sarker, I. H., Kayes, A., Badsha, S., Alqahtani, H., Watters, P., & Ng, A. (2020). Cybersecurity data science: an overview from machine learning perspective. Journal of Big data, 7.29-1.
Schoub, B. D. (2019). Seeing God Through Science: Exploring the Science Narrative to Strengthen and Deepen Faith in the Creator. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Schumacher, L. (2011). The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re‐Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God. Modern Theology, 27(1), 87-101.
Shankar, V., & Parsana, S. (2022). An overview and empirical comparison of natural language processing (NLP) models and an introduction to and empirical application of autoencoder models in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(6), 1324-1350.
Sharma, S., & Yadav, R. (2022). Chat GPT–A Technological Remedy or Challenge for Education System. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 14(4), 46-51.
Spitzer, R. J. (2019). A Contemporary Metaphysical Proof for the Existence of God. International Philosophical Quarterly, 59(4), 427-466.
Tadesse, H. (2022). Scientific Proof of God Based on Quantum Phenomena-Wave Particle Duality as an Overwhelming Evidence of Direct Divine Intervention!
Taghavinasab, S. (2023). God, Existence and Privation: Fārābī and the Logic of Theological Propositions. WoCoLoR 4 THE FOURTH WORLD CONGRESS ON,
Taslaman, C. (2020). The Quantum Theory, Philosophy and God. Cosmo Publishing.
Thalib, P., Kurniawan, F., & Kholiq, M. N. (2020). The application of quranic interpretation, of sunnah and ijtihad as the source of islamic law. Rechtidee Jurnal Hukum, 15(2), 193-206.
Thune, M. (2019). God, Science, and Religious Diversity: A Defense of Theism, by Robert T. Lehe. Faith and Philosophy, 36(3), 407-413.
Turner, D. (2019). God, Mystery, and Mystification. University of Notre Dame Pess.
Ullah, Z., Al-Turjman, F., Mostarda, L., & Gagliardi, R. (2020). Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in smart cities. Computer Communications, 154, 313-323.
Vecera, D. L. (2009). Arguments for and against the existence of God. California State University, Dominguez Hills.
Vydrová, J. (2023). The (Non) place of Human Challenges Concerning the Question of God in Helmuth Plessner’s Philosophical Anthropology. In The Modern Experience of the Religious (pp. 235-249). Brill.
Walker, P. E. (2023). An Ismaili Answer to the Problem of Worshiping the Unknowable, Neoplatonic God. In The Fatimids (pp. Brill.
Willis, W. (2020). Kingdom of God in 20th-Century Interpretation. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Wu, P., He, T., Zhu, H., Wang, Y., Li, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, X., Wang, F., Wang, P., & Shan, C. (2022). Next‐generation machine vision systems incorporating two‐dimensional materials: progress and perspectives. InfoMat, 4(1), e12275.
Zadyousefi, A. (2022). A neglected interpretation of Avicenna’s theory of God’s knowledge of particulars. Asian Philosophy, 32(2), 201-214.
Zaremba, A., & Demir, E. (2023). ChatGPT: Unlocking the future of NLP in finance. Available at SSRN 4323643.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Science and Religion Studies
Volume 15, Issue 2
February 2025
Pages 1-35