حیدری.ا، اصغری.ف و عادلی.ح(1389).ارائه یک مدل جهت پایش طرحهای پژوهشی با سوژه انسانی در ایران،نشریه اخلاق و تاریخ پزشکی.شماره 3 (5).
زاگال، هکتور، گالیندو، خوزه.(1386) داوری اخلاقی؛ فلسفه اخلاق چیست؟ ترجمه حیدری علی احمد، تهران، انتشارات حکمت.
مبشر.م و همکاران(1385).بررسی رعایت اصول اخلاق در پژوهش بر حیوانات آزمایشگاهی به روش کیفی . نشریه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری.
Benčin.r & et al.(2015). Ethics assessment in Humanities. Journal European commission. pp1-20.
Biagetti. M & et al. (2020 ). Ethical Theories in Research Evaluation: An Exploratory Approach. An Exploratory Approach. Scholarly Assessment Reports , 2(1): 11. pp. 2-10 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.19
Brall . c & et al. (2017). Research Ethics 2.0: New Perspectives on Norms, Values, and Integrity in Genomic Research in Times of Even Scarcer Resources. Journal Karger open access.no 20 , pp. 27–35. DOI: 10.1159/000462960.
Doris, J. M., & Stich, S. P. (2007). As a Matter of Fact: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–152.
Fisher R. )2008(. Anthropologists and social impact assessment: negotiating the ethical minefield1. Asia Pac J Anthropol. 9 (3):231–242.
Guillemin. M, Gillam. L, Rosenthal. D & Bolitho A.( 2010). Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. no 5(2): pp. 21-34. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.21
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., et al. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520. pp. 429– 431. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Jennings B, et al.( 2003). Introduction: a strategy for discussing ethical issues in public health. In: Jennings B, editor. Ethics and public health: model curriculum. p. 1–12, [online]. Available from: www.asph.org/UserFiles/EthicsCurriculum. pdf [accessed 21 July 2013].
Johnstone M. ( 2009). Bioethics. A Nursing Perspective. 5th edition Churchil Livingstone Elsevier.
Jameton A. (1984). Nursing Practice. The ethical issues. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Kjellström1, S.; S. N. Ross & B. Fridlund. (2010). Research Ethics in Dissertations: Ethical Issues and Complexity of Reasoning. Journal of Med Ethics. 36. 425-430.
Kilpi H.& Tuomaala U.( 1989). Research Ethics and Nursing Science: an empirical example. Journal of Advanced Nursing;14. Pp. 451-458.
Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., et al. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pbio.3000737
Mustajoki, H., & Mustajoki, A. (2017). A New Approach to Research Ethics: Using Guided Dialogue to Strengthen Research Communities. New York: Routledge. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545318
Pittaway, E.; L. Bartolomel & R. Hugman. (2010). Stop Stealing Our Stories: The Ethic of Research with Vulnerable Groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2(2). 229–251.
Sandu . A & et al. (2020). Social Perception of Ethical Values. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, vol. 19, issue 55 . pp 105-120. ISSN: 1583-0039.
Schüklenk. U & Ashcroft. R.( 2000). International research ethics. Bioethics; 14: 158–172.
Smith D. Five principles for research ethics. Monitor Staff. 2003;34(1):56. Available from: http://www.apa.org/monitor/jan03/principles.aspx [Accessed: August 16, 2014].
Stern JE & Elliott D. (1997). The Ethics of Scientific Research: A Guidebook for Course Development. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England; p 75.
Vanclay.F & et al.(2013). Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. journal Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 243–253.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.850307
Wiles. R & et al (2006). Researching researchers: Lessons for research ethics. Qualitative Research6(3): pp.283-299. DOI: 10.1177/1468794106065004.
Zandvoort H. )2008(. Preparing engineers for social responsibility. Euro J Eng Educ. 33(2):133–140.
)