Document Type : .

Authors

1 Associate Professo at Allameh Tabatabaei University

2 zanjan of univerdity

3 Department of Philosophy and Isamic Theology, , University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

4 Department of Biology, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

For the first time, the concept of irreducible complexity was proposed by Michael Behe in order to criticize Darwin’s theory of evolution based on biochemical facts. He has defined the concept as a single system containing purposeful and interacting parts in which its components possess particular functions. Behe rejects the theory of natural evolution through explaining of biochemical reactions, in details, occurred in environment. Providing scientific evidence and methodology, as well as numerous pre-assumptions in the realm of philosophy of science, Behe demonstrates his inference concerning to irreducible complexity, and answers scientifically to the empirical and methodological objections of the critiques. He divides the life into two parts including reducible and irreducible sections. Based on his theory regarding non-irreducibility of life, Behe invalidates the theory of evolution, possessing gradual processes, in molecular level. Overall, according to various findings and researches made by Behe and the proponents of his theory, the inference of irreducible complexity is now as an inference to the best explanation suggesting appropriately a scientific approach for disclosing the life origin and exhibiting the life has been guided and designated.  

Keywords

استرایر، برگ تیموز (1388)، بیوشیمی، ترجمه­ی رضا محمدی، آییژ، چاپ اول، تهران.
اُکاشا، سمیر (1393)، فلسفه علم، ترجمه­ی هومن پناهنده، فرهنگ معاصر، چاپ پنجم، تهران.
باربور، ایان (1362)، دین و علم، ترجمه­ی فیروز فطورچی، سازمان انتشارات پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی، چاپ اول، تهران.
حسینی، حسن (1391). پیچیدگی تقلیل ناپذیر، برهان های غایت شناختی و تکامل داروینی؛ الهیات یا الحاد، 3(1):15-29، پژوهش نامۀ علم و دین.
فتحی­زاده، مرتضی (1392). طبیعت­گرایی علمی و فراطبعت­گرایی دینی، 4(2):111 -128، پژوهش­های علم و دین. 
گرینبرگ، جان (1389)، زیست شناسی با رویکرد مولکولی، ترجمه­ی محمد کرام الدّینی و همکاران، انتشارات فاطمی، چاپ اول، تهران.
مظفر، محمد رضا (1373)،  اصول الفقه،  مکتب الاعلام الاسلامی، چاپ دوم، قم.
مظفر، محمد رضا (1373)، المنطق، موسسه اسماعیلیان، چاپ ششم، قم.
 
Behe, Michael (1996). Darwin’s Black Box :the biochemical challenge to Evolution, newyork :free press.  
Behe, Michael (2004). "Irreducible Complexity: Obstacle to Darwinian Evolution." In:  Debating Design: from Darwin to DNA, Ruse, M. and Dembski, W.A., eds., Cambridge University Press, pp. 352-370.
Behe, Michael (2007) The Edge of Evolution: The search for the limits of Darwinism, free press NewYork.
Behe, Michal (2005). “The modern intelligent design hypothesisbreaking rules” manson,neila.(ed), in: God and design: landon and newyork: routlede. pp.276-291. 
Behe,.Michael (2001). Reply to my critics: a response to reviews of darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution, Biology and Philosophy, 16: 685–709. 
Behe,Michael (2000(. Self-Organization and irreducibly complex systems: a reply to Shanks and Joplin in: Philosophy of Science, 67 (1); 155-162.
Darwin, Charles (1872). On the origin of species, 6th ed., )1988(, NewYork University press, NewYork.  
Haught, John f (2006). Is nature enough?, Cambridge university press.
Poole,Verla (2012). Acompeherensive introduction to intelligent design, published by: with word publication:with word publications.
Shanks, Nial (2004). God, the Devil, and Darwin, by Oxford University press.
Simmon, Ernest, God of the Gaps in: Encyclopedia of science and Religion,  Wentzel Van Huyssteen, p382.
Young, Matt and  Edis, Taner (2004). Why inteligent design fails: A scientific critique of the new creationism, Rutqers University press.