Science and Religion Studies

Science and Religion Studies

A comparative comparison of religious narratives and scientific perspectives on the origin of man: from creation to life.

Document Type : .

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Theology and Islamic Studies, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran. P.O. Box 889 - 14665
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Biology Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran5.
10.30465/srs.2026.53424.2256
Abstract
Abstract: The inquiry into human origins represents a fundamental intersection of empirical biology, transcendental philosophy, and revealed theology. This study examines the perceived dichotomy between the teleological narratives of Abrahamic traditions—specifically within the framework of Islamic philosophy and mysticism and the non-teleological mechanisms of evolutionary biology. By employing a comparative-interdisciplinary methodology, the research analyzes how religious concepts of purposeful creation and Khilafah (vicegerency) can be dialogically positioned alongside Darwinian concepts of natural selection and genetic mutation. The findings suggest that while methodological boundaries differ, there is a significant conceptual space for integrative models such as theistic evolution. The study concludes that a multidimensional anthropology, which respects both biological how and metaphysical why, provides a more robust understanding of the human phenomenon than any reductionist approach.

Keywords: Creationism; Evolutionary Biology; Islamic Philosophy; Transcendent Wisdom; Intelligent Design; Epistemological Integration.
Introduction: The question of human provenance is not merely a biological puzzle but an ontological inquiry into the nature of being. Historically, the narrative of human origins was the exclusive domain of religion and philosophy, framing humanity as a special creation with an inherent spiritual essence. In Islamic thought, particularly in the works of Ibn Arabi and Mulla Sadra, the human being is viewed as the Microcosm (al-Kawn al-Jami), representing the pinnacle of a hierarchical existential ascent. However, the advent of the Darwinian revolution in the 19th century introduced a paradigm shift, replacing teleological intentionality with blind physical processes. This has led to a persistent intellectual tension: can the biological continuity of the human species be reconciled with the theological claim of human exceptionalism? This study moves beyond the conflict thesis to investigate how different epistemological frameworks address the multidimensionality of human existence, seeking a synthesis that honors both empirical rigor and spiritual depth.
Materials and Methods: This research utilizes a qualitative, analytical-comparative framework. The primary theological and philosophical dataset is derived from the Quranic corpus and the school of Transcendent Wisdom (al-Hikmah al-Mutaaliyah), focusing on the concept of gradual existential perfection. On the scientific side, the study draws from contemporary evolutionary synthesis and the philosophy of science. The methodological approach involves three stages: 1. Conceptual Mapping: Defining Creation and Evolution to avoid semantic equivocation.2. Methodological Demarcation: Distinguishing between empirical proximate causes and metaphysical ultimate causes.3. Integrative Analysis: Evaluating the coherence of Guided Evolution and Intelligent Design as bridging frameworks.
Discussion and Results: The analysis reveals several critical points of convergence and divergence:
1. Process and Gradualism: A significant finding is that both perspectives reject instantaneous appearance. Traditional Islamic philosophy, especially through Mulla Sadra’s Substantial Motion (al-harakah al-jawhariyyah), posits that the soul emerges through the gradual intensification of matter. This provides a sophisticated metaphysical parallel to biological gradualism, suggesting that evolution could be viewed as the material substrate of a spiritual process.
2. The Question of Teleology: This remains the primary point of divergence. Evolutionary biology, by definition, excludes final causes (telos). However, the study argues that this is a methodological restriction rather than an ontological negation. Theistic Evolution serves as a viable result here, proposing that natural selection is the mechanism through which divine providence operates within the spatiotemporal realm.

3. Human Dignity and the Soul: While biology identifies the Homo sapiens as a primate, religious narratives define the Insan through the Divine Breath. The results suggest that these are not contradictory but occupy different levels of reality. The biological account explains the origin of the container (the body), while the religious account explains the origin of the content (the self-conscious spirit).
Conclusion: The study concludes that the conflict between creation and evolution is often a product of category errors-treating scientific descriptions as totalizing metaphysical statements, or treating religious metaphors as literal biological manuals. By adopting an Epistemological Pluralism, we can acknowledge that evolutionary biology provides a comprehensive account of the human's physical lineage, while religion and philosophy provide the necessary framework for understanding human value, morality, and ultimate destiny. A holistic anthropology must therefore be interdisciplinary, viewing evolution not as the replacement of creation, but as the magnificent process through which the creative act unfolds over cosmic time.
Keywords
Subjects

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam: An exposition of the fundamental elements of the worldview of Islam. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).
Al Daghistani, R. (2022). Seyyed Hossein Nasr: »Man and Nature. The Spiritual Crisis in Modern Man«. Welt – Umwelt – Mitwelt, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783495999493-187
Al-Ghazali, M. (2001). Maurice Bucaille. The Bible, The Qur’an and Science: The Holy Scriptures  Examined in the Light of Modern Knowledge. Islamic Studies, 40(2), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v40i2.5298
al-Ṭabarī, M. b. J., & Mays, Kh. (1984/1405 AH). Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān (30 vols.). Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Fikr. [in Persian]
al-Zamakhsharī, M. b. ʿU., Muʿawwaḍ, ʿA. M., ʿAbd al-Mawjūd, ʿA. A., & Ḥijāzī, F. ʿA. R. (1998/1418 AH). Al-Kashshāf ʿan Ḥaqāʾiq Ghawāmiḍ al-Tanzīl wa-ʿUyūn al-Aqāwīl fī Wujūh al-Taʾwīl (6 vols.). Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Maktabat al-ʿUbaykān. [in Persian]
Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologiae (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Benziger Bros. http://dhspriory.org/thomas/english/summa/index.html
Augustine. (1998). Augustine: <I>The City of God against the Pagans</I> (R. W. Dyson, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802300
Ayetollahi, H., & Ahmadi, F. (2013). A review and critique of Plantinga's view on Darwinism. Science and Religion Studies, 4(8), 1–23. [in Persian]
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford University Press.
Collins, F. S. (2006). The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. Free Press.
Cruse, P. (2007). Mary Midgley, The Myths We Live By (London: Routledge, 2003). Think, 2(6), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1477175600002864
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life /. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68064
Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Simon & Schuster.
 
Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S. E., et al. (2002). Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature, 418(6900), 869–872. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01025
Fairbairn, D. J. (1998). Evolutionary Biology.Douglas J. Futuyma. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 73(4), 503–504. https://doi.org/10.1086/420454
Fakhr al-Rāzī, M. b. ʿU., & Maktab al-Taḥqīq Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. (1999/1420 AH). Al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr (32 vols.). Beirut, Lebanon: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [in Persian]
Forrest, B., & Gross, P. R. (2004). Creationism’s Trojan Horse. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195157420.001.0001
Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Maricic, T., Stenzel, U., Kircher, M., ... & Pääbo, S. (2010). A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science, 328(5979), 710–722.
Hansen, T. F. (2005). Evolution. By Douglas J  Futuyma. Sunderland (Massachusetts): Sinauer Associates. $89.95. xv + 603 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0‐87893‐187‐2. 2005. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80(4), 472–473. https://doi.org/10.1086/501261
Haught, J. F. (2008). God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution. Westview Press.
Hubisz, J. L. (2007). MicroReviews by the Book Reviews Editor: Creation-Evolution: Finding Darwin’s God: A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground between God and Evolution: Kenneth R. Miller. The Physics Teacher, 45(9), 579–579. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2809164
Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature, (2005).  437(7055), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04072
In the footsteps of the prophet: lessons from the life of Muhammad. (2007). Choice Reviews Online, 45(03), 45-1422-45–1422. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-1422
Johanson, D. C., & Edey, M. A. (1981). Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind. Simon and Schuster.
Kamkar, Z., Razavi, S., & Amin Nanji, M. H. (2010). A comparison of the stages of human embryonic development according to the Quran, Hadith, and embryology. Science and Religion Studies, 1(2), 139–159. [in Persian]
Khalil, A. (2004). Mulla Sadra, The Elixir of the Gnostics. American Journal of Islam and Society, 21(1), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v21i1.1824
Kingsolver, J. G. (2009). The “If…, Then” of EvolutionWhy Evolution Is True. Jerry A. Coyne . Penguin (Viking), 2009. 304 pp., illus. $27.95 (ISBN 9780670020539 cloth). BioScience, 59(10), 907–908. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.10.14
Kirby, J. (2016). A Natural History of Human Thinking. By Michael Tomasello. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press. $35.00. xiii + 178 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-0-674 -72477-8. 2014. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 91(2), 217–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/686841
Landau, J. (2007). Avicenna. The Metaphysics of The Healing. Al-Šifā’: al-Ilāhiyyāt. A parallel English-Arabic text translated, introduced, and annotated by Michael E. Marmura, Provo, Utah, Brigham Young University - Islamic Translation Series, 2005, xxvii + 441 + 378 p. [anglais-arabe]. Abstracta Iranica, Volume 28. https://doi.org/10.4000/abstractairanica.13352
Lewy, G. (1970). Le Saint Siège et la Guerre en Europe: Juin 1940 - Juin 1941. Vol. 4, Actes et Documents du Saint Siège Relatifs à la Seconde Guerre Mondiale. Edited by Pierre Bletet al. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1967. xxiv + 623 pp. - Le Saint Siège et la Guerre Mondiale: Juillet 1941 - Octobre 1942. Vol. 5, Actes et Documents du Saint Siège Relatifs à la Seconde Guerre Mondiale. Edited by Pierre Bletet al. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1969. xxvi + 795 pp. Church History, 39(4), 567–568. https://doi.org/10.2307/3162966
Makārem Shīrāzī, N. (1995/1374 SH). Tafsīr-e Nemūneh (27 vols., Compiled by a group of scholars, 1st ed.). Tehran, Iran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah. [in Persian]
Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to the Present. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780791481554
Peterson, D. J. (2012). God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens by John F. Haught. Dialog, 51(3), 254–256. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6385.2012.00694.x
Power, C. (2013). Tattersall, Ian. Masters of the planet: the search for our human origins. xxii, 255 pp., fig., illus., bibliogr. Basingstoke, New York; Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. £16.99 (cloth). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(2), 416–417. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12042_12
RELIGION & THE ORDER OF NATURE, By Seyyed Hossein Nasr. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Pbk., vi-ix+310. (2021). International Journal of Islamic Sufism. https://doi.org/10.30546//2789-1992.2021.1.117
Rizvi, S. H. (2013). Mulla Sadra and Metaphysics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879542
Shīrāzī, Ṣadr al-Dīn Muḥammad (Mullā Ṣadrā). (1981). Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʿāliyah fī al-Asfār al-ʿAqliyyah al-Arbaʿah (Vol. 8). Tehran, Iran: Sadra Islamic Philosophy Foundation. [in Persian]
Shults, F. L. (2001). When Science Meets Religion: Enemies, Strangers or Partners? By Ian G. Barbour San Francisco, HarperSanFrancisco, 2000. 205 pp. $16.00. Theology Today, 58(3), 434–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/004057360105800318
Skrenes Trabing, C. (2007). Review of The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief by Francis Collins. The Journal of Baha’i Studies, 17(1–4), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.31581/jbs-17.1-4.5(2007)
Smith, J. M. (2020). Evolution and the Human Story. National Geographic.
Stringer, C., & Andrews, P. (2005). The Complete World of Human Evolution. Thames & Hudson.
Tattersall, I. (2015). The Strange Case of the Rickety Cossack: And Other Cautionary Tales from Human Evolution. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ṭabāṭabāʾī, M. H., & Mūsavī, M. B. (1999/1378 SH). Tafsīr al-Mīzān (20 vols.). Qom, Iran: Islamic Publications Office of the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [in Persian]
The Bezels of Wisdom. (1980). Ibn Al ’Arabi, 43–44. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780809171323.0007
The garden of truth: the vision and promise of Sufism, Islam’s mystical tradition. (2008). Choice Reviews Online, 45(07), 45-3736-45–3736. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-3736
To heal a fractured world: the ethics of responsibility. (2006). Choice Reviews Online, 43(07), 43-3970-43–3970. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3970
Turner, L. A. (2006). The Beginning of Wisdom: Reading Genesis (review). Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies, 24(2), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2006.0035
Weiss, B. (1997). William C. Chittick, Imaginal Worlds: Ibn al-ʿArabi and the Problem of Religious Diversity (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994). Pp. 215. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 29(1), 113–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020743800064187
Whittaker, E. (2000). The Political in Qualitative Methods Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. By John W.  Creswell. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998. 402 pp. $28.95. Current Anthropology, 41(5), 883–884. https://doi.org/10.1086/317417
Ziai, H. (2011). Philosophy of Illumination. In Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195328998.003.0035