Islamic militarization by clarifying the role of social approach
Mohammad
Taabaan
استادیار گروه مدیریت ، دانشکده ادبیات، دانشگاه ایلام
author
Ardeshir
Shiri
استادیار گروه مدیریت . دانشکده ادبیات، دانشگاه ایلام
author
Mahdi
Akbarnejad,
دانشیار دانشکده الهیات، دانشگاه ایلام
author
Safoura
Yousefian
دانشجوی کارشناسیارشد مدیریت منابع انسانی
author
text
article
2016
per
The aim of this study was to assess and describe the Islamic militarization in the field of social. This method combines research was, qualitative study of qualitative content analysis and focus group and for the purpose of exploration_ Practical. Data gathered by the text and the interpretations of verses from the Holy Quran was. The study population consisted of eight people in the focus group of experts in the fields of management and Islamic jurisprudence, respectively.Findings: The content analysis utilizes the Quran was recognized early 483 code. After collecting the information, content analysis to extract and its components through select system components of the method of forming the final focus group was conducted. Islamic system components of the experts, in eight categories, including pervasive themes: Society has the right orbit, Social vision, Social spirituality, Ethical Communication, Social virtue, Consultation and participation-oriented, Meritocracy, transparency, selflessness and sacrifice is. Conclusion: After the formation of the focus group research model in terms of components: truth-oriented society, consultation and participation, meritocracy and transparency, the most important role in the militarization of social approach.
Science and Religion Studies
IHCS
38306462
7
v.
14
no.
2016
1
24
https://elmodin.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2403_3bc0497bfa8f9f3a5e4726564d7e87b9.pdf
Philosophical analysis of Newberg’s view in Neurotheology )A model for relation between science and religion)
Ali
Sanaee
استادیار دانشگاه سمنان- گروه ادیان و عرفان
author
text
article
2016
per
Abstract
Neurotheology as a research program try to represent a new possibility for integrating science and religion, in a manner that the autonomous and relative independence of science and religion will be maintained and none of them won’t reduced to each others. Newberg as a important figure of this field, want to determine the positive effects of religious beliefs and rituals on healthy of body and psyche. He suggests that the mystical experience is the root of all religions and want to determine the relation between every component of mystical experience with mechanisms of brain by integrating of phenomenology and neuroscience. Newberg claims that the neurotheology can show how the theological concepts was formed. By philosophical analysis I will be noticed that he despite his claims, reduce religion to science and this result in a contradiction in his view and on the other side, he is within the metaphysical discourse.
Science and Religion Studies
IHCS
38306462
7
v.
14
no.
2016
25
42
https://elmodin.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2407_49222d13230c59c4b658dfa9d95ac2c3.pdf
نقد پلنتینگا بر تکاملباوری داوکینز
Ali
Sadeqi
دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه دین پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی
author
Morteza
Fathizadeh
عضو هیات علمی گروه فلسفه دانشگاه خوارزمی
author
text
article
2016
per
چکیده
پس از آنکه در قرن هفدهم میلادی مدعای تعارض علم جدید و دین، در بستر مناقشات میان احکام نجوم جدید و آموزه­های کتاب مقدس مسیحی، شکل گرفت، داروینیسمِ سربرآورده در قرن 19 جبهه جدیدی گشود و بر آتش تعارض در بسترمناقشه میان آفرینش­گرایی، به منزله یکی از آموزه­های اصلی کتاب مقدس مسیحی،و تکامل گرایی زیست شناختی دامن زد و مدعی شد که این آموزه دینی استحکام و اتقان علمی ندارد. ریچارد داوکینز، به عنوان یکی از مدافعان پر سر و صدای داروینیسم، نیروهای کور طبیعی را برای توضیح پیدایش انسان کافی دانست و به بی­نیازی از خدا حکم کرد. پلنتینگا، ضمن کوشش برای صورت­بندی تکامل­باوری، دو مدعای اصلی تکامل­باوری، یعنی "تصادفی" بودن تکامل و همچنین مدعای منشأ مشترک، را به چالش می­گیرد و تاکید می کند که نتایج مورد نظر تکامل­باوران به طور خاص، و مدعیان تعارض علم و دین به طور عام، نه برعلم، بلکه بر پایه ترکیبی از علم و طبیعت­گرایی متافیزیکی استوار است.اوافزوده طبیعت­گرایی متافیزیکی به علم را نه پذیرفتنی می­داند و نه ذاتی تبیین­های علمی،بلکه علم جدیدرا با باورهای دینی سازگارتر می پندارد.
Science and Religion Studies
IHCS
38306462
7
v.
14
no.
2016
43
60
https://elmodin.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2409_d1987ae6307fe082e5d1480cacdef4e7.pdf
Leibniz’s Proof of the Existence of God Based on the Eternal Truths
Ali
Fath Taheri
دانشیار فلسفه دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی
author
text
article
2016
per
Unlike Russell's assertion that Leibniz idea of God and his proof of God's existence is the weakest part of his philosophy, I believe that this part constitutes the most basic part of his philosophy. In his philosophical system without God nothing can exist or is possible to exist. Hence, proving the existence of God for him is a necessary task. One of his most important proofs of God's existence is the proof based on the eternal truth. Some are of the view that this proof is more convincing than ontological proof and even the latter depends on the former. This paper is an attempt to carry out a critical study of different versions of the same proof.
Science and Religion Studies
IHCS
38306462
7
v.
14
no.
2016
61
78
https://elmodin.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2410_99e9d389ee7ee4e0e8bc0acf6e405de9.pdf
A Critical Analysis of Avicenna's Argument from Contingency and
Mulla Sadra's Objection to It
Shaker
Lavaei
عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه خوارزمی
author
Tayebe
Rezaei Rah
کارشناس ارشد دانشگاه خوارزمی
author
text
article
2016
per
The argument from contingency which was first put forward by Al-Farabi, was subsequently developed by Avicenna. Al-Farabi's argument is based on the impossibility of an infinite regres, but Avicenna proves this imopssibility during his argument. So, to accept the Avicennian argument one doesn’t need to accept the impossibility of an infinite regres in advanced. This is one of the differences between Al-Farabi's and Avicenna's argument from contingency. Although Avicenna claims to have brought a greater innovation in Al-Isharat, and he maintains that this argument proves the existence of the necessary being even with the possibility of an infinite regress, his claim seems unjustified, since first, in contrast to Avicenna's claim and what is commonly believed, there is no crucial distinction between Avicenna's argument from contingency in Al-Isharat and the ones mentioned in Al-Mabdaa- wa-Al-maad and Al-Nijat. And second, his claim is not true about any of his arguments.
Another major flaw in Avicennian argument is his stance on the criterion of the need for a cause.
On the other hand, Mulla sadra's objection to this argument is not acceptable as well. He says contrary to Avicenna's claim, the chain of contingent things is not a contingent being. But Mulla sadra's argument has two problems. First, it's based on the premise that "existence is coextensive with unity" which can not be used as the middle term of an argument. Second, this objection is in conflict with his theory of the real unity of the universe.
Science and Religion Studies
IHCS
38306462
7
v.
14
no.
2016
79
95
https://elmodin.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2411_6235e0f1eb9802dde43f5c3978aa34b2.pdf
مقایسه بین جوهرفرد از نظر متکلمان اسلامی و ذرات بنیادین در فیزیک نوین
Hamed
Naji
استادیار گروه فلسفه دانشگاه اصفهان
author
Naser
Ghasemi
دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد فلسفه علم دانشگاه اصفهان
author
text
article
2016
per
چکیده
جوهر­فرد متکلمان اسلامی و ذرات بنیادین در فیزیک نوین، دو دیدگاه بظاهر متفاوت در تبیین ماهیت ماده در جهان قابل مشاهده است، این دو دیدگاه که هر یک با خاستگاه ها و روشها و پرسشهای خاص خود به نظاره عالم ماده نشسته اند ، در فرجام کار در موارد متعددی به هم اقتران یافته اند و گزاره های مشابهی را در تبیین ماده محسوس عرضه نموده اند.
گفتار حاضر بر آن است که در ابتدا با بیان هر یک از این دو نظریه، به پیامدهای مشترک آنها اشاره کند، که در این میان توجه به غیر قابل انقسام بودن اجزای اولیه عالم ماده ، شکلمند بودن خاص این اجزاء و حرکتمند بودن داپمی آنها و چگونگی تبیین مفهوم خلأ بایسته ذکر است.
Science and Religion Studies
IHCS
38306462
7
v.
14
no.
2016
97
116
https://elmodin.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2412_d0a72c0cbdde0d462629b55a87eef3af.pdf